<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSource Jokes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.chmouel.com/2007/01/21/opensource-jokes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.chmouel.com/2007/01/21/opensource-jokes/</link>
	<description>Random and probably boring stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Winston</title>
		<link>http://blog.chmouel.com/2007/01/21/opensource-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chmouel.com/blog/2007/01/21/opensource-jokes/#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>Maybe they have the &quot;stupid google ads&quot; to pay for hosting or the like. I&#039;m certain nobody with a small site would get rich or are profiting off people. I don&#039;t understand your problem with it? Google ads are the best ads out there, that is, non-intrusive and I believe they don&#039;t pay on an impression base only a click base so it&#039;s not like those flashing banners. I had a friend who used to give me my hosting so I never needed to pay a hosting bill, thus never needed to put ads, but I understand why people would. Plus if people spend a fair chunk of time on a website why not get a little extra cash for your effort? The ads are based on the content so if you have an article about say postgres, people might see a link to a postgres forum advertised, they can click on that and get to more postgres information. It is a win/win situation. (I&#039;ve noticed some google ads are not asking you to buy things as well, so its not just trying to extract money).  

Having said all that, I would not be offended and would recommend you getting those text based ads like opensourcejokes.com does on their home page, thats if you pay for hosting (or aren&#039;t ridiculously rich). You&#039;ll help with that $30-$40 a month bill and you may help one person find what they are looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they have the &#8220;stupid google ads&#8221; to pay for hosting or the like. I&#8217;m certain nobody with a small site would get rich or are profiting off people. I don&#8217;t understand your problem with it? Google ads are the best ads out there, that is, non-intrusive and I believe they don&#8217;t pay on an impression base only a click base so it&#8217;s not like those flashing banners. I had a friend who used to give me my hosting so I never needed to pay a hosting bill, thus never needed to put ads, but I understand why people would. Plus if people spend a fair chunk of time on a website why not get a little extra cash for your effort? The ads are based on the content so if you have an article about say postgres, people might see a link to a postgres forum advertised, they can click on that and get to more postgres information. It is a win/win situation. (I&#8217;ve noticed some google ads are not asking you to buy things as well, so its not just trying to extract money).  </p>
<p>Having said all that, I would not be offended and would recommend you getting those text based ads like opensourcejokes.com does on their home page, thats if you pay for hosting (or aren&#8217;t ridiculously rich). You&#8217;ll help with that $30-$40 a month bill and you may help one person find what they are looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

